E&I Members: Make Your Voice Heard in Less Than a Minute! Help us improve your experience-fast, simple, and meaningful.
A procurement strategy in higher education sets the direction for how sourcing, purchasing, and supplier management decisions are made over time. It creates the framework and guardrails to make sure purchasing supports institutional goals, solid financial stewardship, and public accountability.
Effective procurement strategies are built on a small set of core pillars that balance:
Together, these pillars create a foundation that can be applied consistently across categories and departments. While the details of your pillars may be different, here is an example of a typical foundation for procurement strategy.
COST CONTROL | COMPLIANCE |
· Total cost of ownership: Evaluating purchase price plus ongoing costs like maintenance, training, support, and disposal · Volume leverage: Aggregating spend across departments to negotiate better pricing and terms · Budget predictability: Creating stable, foreseeable costs that help with financial planning · Waste reduction: Eliminating maverick spending, duplicate purchases, and unnecessary variants · Strategic timing: Making purchases when market conditions are favorable or avoiding rush orders that command premiums | · Regulatory compliance: Following federal, state, and local procurement laws · Grant requirements: Meeting specific purchasing rules attached to research grants and restricted funding · Ethical standards: Maintaining conflict-of-interest policies and fair competition practices · Audit readiness: Documenting decisions and maintaining records that can withstand scrutiny · Internal policies: Following institutional governance, approval hierarchies, and purchasing authorities · Diversity goals: Meeting supplier diversity requirements or MWBE (Minority and Women-owned Business Enterprise) targets |
SUPPLIER ALIGNMENT | LONG-TERM INSTITUTIONAL VALUE |
· Mission compatibility: Selecting suppliers whose values align with institutional priorities (sustainability, diversity, community engagement) · Capability matching: Ensuring vendors can meet specialized needs · Relationship quality: Building partnerships with suppliers who understand higher education’s unique requirements · Innovation support: Working with vendors who can evolve with changing institutional needs and bring forward-thinking solutions · Risk management: Vetting suppliers for financial stability, security practices, and business continuity capabilities · Local and regional considerations: Supporting community economic development when appropriate. | · Strategic fit: Ensuring purchases support long-term academic plans, enrollment goals, and research strategies · Scalability: Selecting solutions that can grow with the institution without requiring complete replacement · Lifecycle planning: Considering durability, upgrade paths, and end-of-life implications · Knowledge building: Developing internal expertise and institutional memory around key purchases · Reputation protection: Making choices that reflect well on the institution’s values and commitment to responsible stewardship · Stakeholder satisfaction: Building trust with faculty, staff, students, and community through thoughtful purchasing |
These are all important in theory, but the key is applying the theory consistently in execution. It’s way too easy to fall into predictable habits, even when things change. The most effective procurement strategies act as an ongoing discipline that you can adapt to emerging challenges if you want to build a sustainable model.
Procurement strategy delivers the most value when it is applied consistently in day-to-day decisions. In higher education, this is often where strategy breaks down. Decentralized purchasing authority, urgent academic needs, and varied funding sources can create pressure to prioritize speed over alignment.
Effective institutions treat procurement strategy as an operating discipline. Execution is reinforced through structured processes, governance, and shared expectations, rather than left to individual interpretation.
Category management is one of the most effective ways to translate your procurement strategy into action. By managing spend through defined categories, you can apply consistent sourcing approaches over time and balance priorities.
When first implementing a particular strategy, you may want to start with a single category to validate your process. Despite hundreds or thousands of suppliers, 90% of higher education procurement dollars are spent on just 20% of suppliers, so it often works best to focus on one of these high-value categories where your strategy will have the most measurable impact. Working with suppliers, you can build collaborative solutions that benefit both parties.
When departments are left on their own to make purchasing decisions, you often get fragmented spend or off-contract spend. This can drive up costs and increase compliance risk. Even purchases that fit specific departmental needs may not fit your overall institutional goals.
Conversely, a shared decision framework can align departmental needs with institutional priorities. Clear criteria help departments understand how factors such as total cost of ownership, supplier capability, and long-term fit influence purchasing decisions. This consistency improves transparency, simplifies justification, and positions procurement as a collaborative partner rather than an obstacle.
Governance plays a critical role in sustaining a procurement strategy. Your strategy must outline clear roles, approval thresholds, and escalation paths to ensure that compliance, risk, and contractual considerations are addressed early.
A strong governance framework helps make purchasing decisions easier and faster.
See how competitively solicited cooperative contracts can fit into your procurement strategy, streamline your purchasing process, and deliver significant savings. E&I Cooperative Services is the only member-owned nonprofit sourcing cooperative that exclusively serves the education sector.